Formalization of {UML} state machines using temporal logic
Abstract
Citation
Please, cite this work as:
[REG04] C. Rossi, M. Enciso, and I. P. de Guzmán. “Formalization of UML state machines using temporal logic”. In: Softw. Syst. Model. 3.1 (2004), pp. 31-54. DOI: 10.1007/S10270-003-0029-7. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-003-0029-7.
Bibliometric data
The following data has been extracted from resources such as OpenAlex, Dimensions, PlumX or Altmetric.
Cites
The following graph plots the number of cites received by this work from its publication, on a yearly basis.
Papers citing this work
The following is a non-exhaustive list of papers that cite this work:
[1] A. Belghiat, A. Chaoui, M. Maouche, et al. “Formalization of Mobile UML Statechart Diagrams Using the π-calculus: An Approach for Modeling and Analysis”. In: Information and Software Technologies. Springer International Publishing, 2014, p. 236–247. ISBN: 9783319119588. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11958-8_19. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11958-8_19.
[2] M. Gogolla, P. Ziemann, and S. Kuske. “Towards an Integrated Graph Based Semantics for UML”. In: Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 72.3 (Feb. 2003), p. 160–175. ISSN: 1571-0661. DOI: 10.1016/s1571-0661(04)80619-4. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1571-0661(04)80619-4.
[3] G. Graw and P. Herrmann. “Transformation and Verification of Executable UML Models”. In: Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 101 (Nov. 2004), p. 3–24. ISSN: 1571-0661. DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2004.09.006. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2004.09.006.
[4] M. Kezai and A. Khababa. “Generating Maude Specifications from M-UML Statechart Diagrams”. In: Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics 26.1 (Jan. 2022), p. 8–16. ISSN: 1343-0130. DOI: 10.20965/jaciii.2022.p0008. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2022.p0008.
[5] R. Klimek. Generating Logical Specifications from Requirements Models for Deduction-based Formal Verification. 2014. DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.1402.1985. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.1985.
[6] S. Kuske, M. Gogolla, H. Kreowski, et al. “Towards an integrated graph-based semantics for UML”. In: Software & Systems Modeling 8.3 (Aug. 2008), p. 403–422. ISSN: 1619-1374. DOI: 10.1007/s10270-008-0101-4. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-008-0101-4.
[7] M. S. Lund, A. Refsdal, and K. Stølen. “4 Semantics of UML Models for Dynamic Behavior: A Survey of Different Approaches”. In: Model-Based Engineering of Embedded Real-Time Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, p. 77–103. ISBN: 9783642162770. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16277-0_4. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16277-0_4.
[8] C. Rossi, M. Enciso, and Á. Mora. “A First Order Temporal Logic for Behavior Representation”. In: Advances in Artificial Intelligence – IBERAMIA 2004. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004, p. 408–418. ISBN: 9783540304982. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30498-2_41. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30498-2_41.
[9] V. C. Storey, R. Lukyanenko, and A. Castellanos. “Conceptual Modeling: Topics, Themes, and Technology Trends”. In: ACM Computing Surveys 55.14s (Jul. 2023), p. 1–38. ISSN: 1557-7341. DOI: 10.1145/3589338. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3589338.
